A new rule by the EPA to no longer consider the economic cost of human health from two major air pollutants in its ...
The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...
The Environmental Protection Agency says it will stop calculating how much money is saved in health care costs avoided and ...
Experts fear consequences will include health complications, stalled industry, a society further disconnected from science ...
The agency is abandoning a longstanding policy to calculate the monetary savings in avoided deaths and disease from cutting ...
MACH Engineering reports that industrial air pollution harms economies by increasing healthcare costs and reducing ...
When indoor air pollution makes the news in western countries, it often feels like a local issue. One week it focuses on wood ...
In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary ...
The Trump administration plans to stop assigning value to human life when analyzing the costs and benefits of air pollution ...
Instead of assessing the value of saving human lives, the EPA will calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits.
EPA will no longer assign dollar values to health benefits when regulating PM2.5 and ozone, marking a shift in federal air ...
Low-income and ethnically diverse communities in post-industrial Northern English cities face up to 33% more air pollution ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results