On Thursday, the Supreme Court will take up a case that could decide how quickly President Donald Trump can implement his second term agenda as it hears arguments about nationwide injunctions that allow a single judge to block a policy for the entire country.

The National Assembly on Wednesday proposed a special counsel investigation into allegations that the Supreme Court interfered in the upcoming presidential election by abusing its judicial authority in the retrial of Democratic Party (DP) candidate Lee Jae-myung.

Now, legal scholars are looking to an upcoming Supreme Court ruling to set a key precedent. That case is Trump v. Wilcox, which arose after Mr. Trump fired Gwynne Wilcox from her position on the National Labor Relations Board, an independent federal agency ...

The case challenges whether congressional safeguards ... citing a 1935 Supreme Court precedent. The upcoming Supreme Court decision could clarify whether Trump has the authority to fire Federal ...

The first hearing for the Waqf Law was held on April 16, 2025 by a Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna with Justices P.V. Sanjay Kumar and K.V. Viswanathan. During this, the top court heard 10 petitions filed to challenge the 2025 amendment act.