Dead Ringers: Ep 6. Super-injunctions, Superheroes, and, er, Diane Abbott. We use cookies to give you the best online ...

Gagging orders' are mostly wielded by the rich but the government's use of one on the Afghan data leak raises concerns about ...

Following a blocked Trump executive order on election integrity, America First Legal urges a key federal agency to ...

Sheffield City Council has accepted an independent review's recommendation for a full apology for its "heavy-handed" legal ...

Three weeks after the Supreme Court ruled to limit the use of nationwide, or universal, injunctions in a case stemming from ...

Super-injunctions are bad things. They suppress debate about matters that should be in the public domain by rendering ...

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

Opinion: Washington & Lee law professor Suzette Malveaux says the Supreme Court has chipped away at class actions for decades ...

Constitutional rights have to be enforceable. They can’t rely on the goodwill of the government. This utter lack of ...

Judges presiding over challenges to President Donald Trump‘s agenda are turning to administrative law to nullify his policies ...

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled a program that collects fees to help underserved areas was legal, David Murray writes.

A review of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc., which held that federal district courts’ universal preliminary injunctions that enjoin government officials from implementing and ...